The University of Iowa Technology Institute (ITI) was selected in 2019 to conduct neutral, third-party validation of the research behind the new Army Combat Fitness Test, which is the U.S. Army's primary physical fitness test. Learn more about our work. 

 

What is the ACFT?

The ACFT was designed to create a gender-blind test that more accurately predicts male and female soldiers’ combat readiness while reducing injuries. The classic fitness test, the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT), uses timed sit-ups, push-ups, and a two-mile run with different baselines based on gender. The APFT had not had a significant overhaul since being implemented in 1980 and was viewed as an insufficient predictor of field abilities. 

The ACFT measures soldiers in six events – deadlift, leg tuck, sprint-drag-carry, two-mile run, standing power throw, and hand-release push-ups – with baselines established at three levels based on the physical demands of different job types. Taken together, the drills predict whether a soldier can meet the fitness level necessary to safely perform tasks in a combat environment. The ACFT is still being phased in. All active soldiers will be required to take the ACFT twice annually, while Reserve and Guard soldiers will be required to take it once a year. Learn more about the ACFT here

 

What is ITI's role?

The U.S. Army Center for Initial Military Training at Ft. Eustis, VA, conducted a Baseline Soldier Physical Readiness Requirements Study (BSPRRS), which became the central research behind the design of the ACFT.

ITI was contracted to perform two key tasks in validating the BSPRRS. 

The first function was for ITI's Virtual Soldier Research Program to conduct an independent peer review evaluating whether the conceptual framework and methodological approach of the BSPRRS were sound and met scientific standards. Secondly, ITI was to determine whether conclusions drawn from evidence were valid. 

 

Key findings

ITI completed the review of the BSPRRS on April 1, 2020. View ITI's report to the right.

  1. The BSPRRS successfully achieved the stated aims. The resulting six-event ACFT is based on a scientifically valid examination of experimental results and is predictive of combat soldier task performance in men and women.
  2. Both strengths and inherent limitations are addressed in a feasible manner. The University of Iowa assessment of the BSPRRS Study is that it was conducted by a well-qualified team of scientists and military personnel, the methodologies utilized were appropriate and rigorous, and the results provide strong baseline empirical validation for the Army Combat Fitness Test.
  3. ITI modeled the physical requirements needed to complete Common Soldier Tasks (CST) and Battle Drills (BD) and the drills that make up the Army Combat Fitness Test. The modeling validates the spectrum of drills is needed to accurately measure the threshold of physical requirements.  
  4. The ACFT is a better predictor of fitness levels required to perform combat duties than the APFT.

 

Ongoing work

Subsequent phases of the ACFT review called for an independent academic expert to validate assumptions about the correlation between the six events in the ACFT with the demands of specific duties (e.g., the deadlift correlated to lifting ammunition canisters and stretchers). ITI is actively conducting this work. 

ITI expertise in human motion capture is being leveraged to measure joint angles and torques on the joints of human subject models executing various movements. The data is ingested into Santos and Sophia, which are ITI’s biomechanically accurate virtual human environments, to simulate and predict performance outcomes across dozens of body types. 

 

Why Iowa?

America's heartland has been at the forefront of keeping soldiers safe for decades. ITI is based at the University of Iowa as a unit of the College of Engineering. Over its nearly 40-year history, ITI—formerly Center for Computer-Aided Design—has established itself as a leader in the field of modeling and simulation led by world-renowned experts.

ITI is home to Santos, a visually realistic, biomechanically accurate high-fidelity digital human modeling framework introduced in 2003, and female counterpart Sophia. The "digital twins," or virtual avatars, replicate the human experience and impact for training, acquisition, and injury prevention purposes. Santos and Sophia have proven valuable over numerous tests of new equipment and processes for the Department of Defense, industry, and other agencies, to make them safer, more efficient, and more productive. Virtual modeling and simulation provide a cost-effective method for testing before development begins. ITI is the only vendor that is creating digital twins of female soldiers.